Skip to content

Enforcement Highlights

  • About Us
  • Contact
  • Cookie Policy
Enforcement
Highlights

Covering SEC, CFTC, FINRA, PCAOB, States, Exchanges, & FCA Enforcement Activities

SEC Enforcement’s First Public Company Cases Resulting from its EPS Initiative

On September 28, 2020, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) announced two settlements against public companies and individual charges against the former controller and chief accounting officer and the former chief financial officer of one of the companies. In its accompanying public announcement, the SEC advised that “The actions are the first arising from investigations generated by the Division of Enforcement’s EPS Initiative, which utilizes risk-based data analytics to uncover potential accounting and disclosure violations caused by, among other things, earnings management practices.”  This initiative exemplifies the harnessing of “Big Data,” i.e., large data sets that may be analyzed computationally to reveal patterns, trends, and associations.

The first settlement, against Fulton Financial Corporation, a Pennsylvania-based financial services company, involved findings that this company inaccurately presented its financial performance in late 2016 and early 2017. During two quarters of the quarters in which the company was on track to meet or beat analyst consensus EPS estimates, the order found that the company’s public filings included a valuation allowance for its mortgage servicing rights that was at odds with the valuation methodology described in the same filings. The SEC’s order found that in mid-2017, the company belatedly reversed the valuation allowance, increasing its EPS by a penny in a quarter when it otherwise would have fallen short of consensus estimates. As alleged in the order, this company’s disclosures created the misleading appearance of consistent earnings across multiple reporting periods. Despite the order’s acknowledgment of the company’s cooperation and remediation, this company was ordered to pay a $1.5 million civil monetary penalty.

The second settlement, against Interface, Inc. a Georgia-based modular carpet manufacturer, and two individuals involved findings that in multiple quarters in 2015 and 2016, the company made unsupported, manual accounting adjustments that were not compliant with GAAP. These adjustments were often made when internal forecasts indicated that the company would likely fall short of analyst consensus EPS estimates. The order found that the adjustments boosted the company’s income, making it possible for the company to consistently report earnings that met or exceeded estimates.  According to the order, the former controller and chief accounting officer directed the unsupported adjustments, including those made to management bonus accruals and stock-based compensation accounts. The order also found that the company’s former chief financial officer caused the controller and chief accounting officer to direct some of the unsupported entries. For their violations, and amongst other remedies, the SEC imposed three-year and one-year suspensions on these two individuals, respectively, regarding the privilege of appearing or practicing before the SEC as accountants. Again, despite the settlement order acknowledging the company’s cooperation and remediation, this company was ordered to pay a $5 million civil monetary penalty.

Despite touting this EPS Initiative and the egregious nature of the facts alleged in both settlements, the SEC did not charge the companies or the two individuals with more serious scienter-based violations. The first company was only charged with violations of the reporting, books and records, and internal control violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The second company was charged with these technical violations and also charged with violations of Sections 17(a)(2) and 17(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933 (“Securities Act”). While these latter two charges are more serious, they are not scienter-based violations that require evidence of knowing misconduct. Once again, the SEC elected not to charge the more serious and scienter-based violation of Section 17(a)(1) of the Securities Act.

In terms of takeaways, this announcement and the accompanying settlements reveal that the SEC is continuing to aggressively police public companies. Further, these efforts reflect a proactive and strategic EPS Initiative that utilized risk-based data analytics to uncover potential accounting and disclosure violations. In its acknowledgments, the Division of Enforcement thanked staff in its Office of Investigative and Market Analytics. Moreover, it also exemplifies that companies that cooperate may be able to avoid fraud-based charges, but they will be given little “cooperation credit” in the context of paying civil penalties.

With the SEC’s recent history of celebrating its initiatives, we can expect more cases and investigations related to this EPS Initiative and additional initiatives being developed in coordination with the Office of Investigative and Market Analytics.

Subscribe and Receive Alerts to New Articles

SUBSCRIBE
October 2, 2020
Written by: Michael MacPhail
Category: Public Companies, Accounting, and Auditing
Tags: Enforcement, EPS

Post navigation

Previous Previous post: CCO Barred for Altering Reports to Mislead SEC Staff
Next Next post: SEC Continues to Prioritize COVID Fraud Cases

Subscribe to Email Alerts

Categories

  • Compliance and Supervision
  • Futures and Derivatives
  • Hedge Funds and Private Equity
  • Insider and Manipulative Trading
  • Investment Advisers and Broker Dealers
  • Municipal Bond Offerings
  • Public Companies, Accounting, and Auditing

©2023 Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP. All Rights Reserved. Lawyer Advertising.

  • About Us
  • Contact
  • Cookie Policy
We use cookies to improve your experience with our website. By browsing our site, you are agreeing to the use of cookies. For more information about how we use cookies, please review our privacy policy and cookie policy. OK
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT